Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market

Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market: Focus on Technology Trends, Application, Regulatory Framework, and Competitive Mapping Analysis and Forecast: 2019-2028

The global industrial microbiological QC market has been witnessing a steady growth. The market is expected to continue to grow with a single digit CAGR of 6.22% during the forecast period, 2019-2028.

SKU: BH116C
Published Year: 2019
REQUEST SAMPLE
PLEASE SELECT A LICENSE TYPE
 
 
 

  REQUEST    SAMPLE

Over the past few decades, companies have invested in the quality control of the production process, equipment, and training for product testing. These investments and resulting improvements are not consistent for all the industries. However, the increasing globalization of the supply of the products continues to drive immense changes and improvements in the overall industrial microbiological QC market. Although microbiological testing is reasonably spread around the world, testing practices within various geographic regions vary significantly. Automation provides significant time and cost savings, while also reducing the potential of human error. It also enables the provision of consistently reliable and accurate results. There are commercially available automated and semi-automated systems that are based on several technologies such as real-time PCR, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, flow cytometry, bioluminescence technology, and Enzyme-linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA), among others. Most of these technologies are aimed at providing efficiency gains when compared to traditional laboratory technologies, and therefore have significant potential for both time and cost savings. Hence, these technologies are adopted for the detection and identification of pathogens and other micro-organisms in the manufacturing process of industries, to avoid the further chances of the product recalls.

The purpose of the study is to gain a holistic view of the global industrial microbiological QC market in terms of various factors, including regulatory reforms and technological advancements, which are influencing the market. The market has been segmented into ‘applications’, ‘technologies’, ‘consumers’, and ‘regions’. The scope of this report is centered upon conducting a detailed study of the products allied with the global industrial microbiological QC market. The market has also been broadly classified into product revenue, testing revenue, and testing volume for each of the aforementioned segments. In addition, the study also includes the exhaustive information on the unmet needs, perception on the new products, competitive landscape, market share of leading manufacturers, growth potential of application, technology, consumer, region, and companies, as well as other vital information with respect to global industrial microbiological QC market. The report presents the reader with an opportunity to unlock comprehensive insights with respect to the market and helps in forming well-informed strategic decisions. The research uncovers some of the substantial parameters that must be taken into consideration before entering into the market.

This research report aims at answering various aspects of the global industrial microbiological QC market with the help of the key factors driving the market, the restraints, and the current growth opportunities that are going to shape the future trajectory of the market expansion. The report includes an in-depth examination of the key players and recent developments taking place in this market. Moreover, the report includes chapters on market dynamics (market drivers, opportunities, and challenges) and industry analysis as well.

The research study highlights the factors governing the industry attractiveness with Porter’s Five Forces for a comprehensive understanding of the global industrial microbiological QC market. Moreover, the study includes detailed product mapping, market estimation, and analysis of key trends in multiple geographical regions, growth of global industrial microbiological QC market in each region for different applications, and the key strategies and developments by the prominent manufacturers.

The answers to the following key questions can be derived from this report:

•    What are the major market drivers, challenges, and opportunities in the global industrial microbiological QC market?
•    What are the underlying structures resulting in the emerging trends within the global industrial microbiological QC market?
•    How is each segment of the global industrial microbiological QC market expected to grow during the forecast period and what is the anticipated revenue generated by each of the segments by the end of 2028?
•   What are the key developmental strategies which are implemented by the major players in order to sustain in the competitive market? What are the key standardization implications in developed regions for industrial microbiological QC products?
•    What are the countermeasures in case of failing QC procedures for each industry? 
•    What are the key success factors for companies to remain relevant and competitive in this crowded market? 
•    Who are the leading players with significant offerings to the global industrial microbiological QC market? What is the current market dominance for each of these leading players?
•   What is the expected compound growth rate witnessed by the leading players in the market during the forecast period 2019-2028? Which industrial microbiology QC product type is anticipated to have the most promising growth? 
•    What are the key applications in the global industrial microbiological QC market? What are the major segments of these applications? What technologies are dominating these application segments?
•    What are the major technologies that are employed in the global industrial microbiological QC market? Which is the dominating technology?
•    Who are the primary consumers of the global industrial microbiological QC market? Which is the fastest growing consumer segment in the global industrial microbiological QC market?
•   Who are the key manufacturers in the global industrial microbiological QC market, and what are their contributions? Also, what is the growth potential of each major manufacturer?
•    What is the scope of the global industrial microbiological QC market in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Rest-of-the-World?

The key manufacturers who have been contributing significantly to the global industrial microbiological QC market include 3M Company, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Biolog, Inc., bioMérieux SA, BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH, Bruker Corporation, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Danaher Corporation, Merck KGaA, Novacyt S.A. (Primerdesign Ltd.), QIAGEN N.V., R-Biopharm AG, Sartorius AG, Shimadzu Corporation, Sysmex Corporation, and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., among others.

    Executive Summary    
    1    Market Overview
          1.1    Market Introduction
          1.2    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market Overview
          1.3    Economic Burden of the Failed Microbiological QC
                   1.3.1    Pharmaceutical Industry
                   1.3.2    Food, Beverage, Agriculture & Fermentation Industry
                   1.3.3    Cosmetic Industry
                   1.3.4    Water Industry
                   1.3.5    Paper Industry
                   1.3.6    Biotechnology Industry
                   1.3.7    Other Industries

    2    Industry Insights
          2.1    Key Developments and Strategies
                   2.1.1    Awards, Recognition, Investments, and Expansions
                   2.1.2    Product Launches and Approvals
                   2.1.3    Collaborations, Partnerships, Joint Venture, and Agreements
                   2.1.4    Mergers and Acquisitions
          2.2    Legal Requirements and Regulations
                   2.2.1    Microbiology Standards
                   2.2.2    Pharmaceutical Industry
                               2.2.2.1    FDA Guidance
                               2.2.2.2    EU Directives
                               2.2.2.3    Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
                   2.2.3    Food and Beverage Industry
                               2.2.3.1    FDA Guidance
                               2.2.3.2    EU Directive
                               2.2.3.3    Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
                   2.2.4    Dairy Industry
                               2.2.4.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.4.2    EU Directive
                               2.2.4.3    Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
                   2.2.5    Agriculture and Fermentation Industry
                               2.2.5.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.5.2    EU Directive
                               2.2.5.3    Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
                   2.2.6    Paper Industry
                               2.2.6.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.6.2    EU Directive
                   2.2.7    Biotechnology Industry
                               2.2.7.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.7.2    EU Directive
                   2.2.8    Cosmetic Industry
                               2.2.8.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.8.2    EU Directive
                  2.2.9    Water Industry
                               2.2.9.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.9.2    EU Directives
         2.3    Patent Analysis
                  2.3.1    by Country
                  2.3.2    by Year

    3    Technology Trends
          3.1    Introduction
          3.2    Real-Time PCR
                   3.2.1    Introduction
                   3.2.2    Market Penetration
          3.3    MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
                   3.3.1    Introduction
                   3.3.2    Market Penetration
                   3.3.3    Market Size and Forecast
          3.4    Bioluminescence Technology
                   3.4.1    Introduction
                   3.4.2    Market Penetration
          3.5    Flow Cytometry
                   3.5.1    Introduction
                   3.5.2    Market Penetration
                   3.5.3    Market Size and Forecast
          3.6    Membrane Filtration
                   3.6.1    Introduction
                   3.6.2    Market Penetration
                   3.6.3    Market Size and Forecast
          3.7    Fluorescent-based Technology
                   3.7.1    Introduction
                   3.7.2    Market Penetration
                   3.7.3    Market Size and Forecast
          3.8    Colorimetric Technology
                   3.8.1    Colorimetric Technology: Introduction
                   3.8.2    Market Penetration
                   3.8.3    Market Size and Forecast
          3.9    Sandwich Hybridization
                   3.9.1    Introduction
                   3.9.2    Market Penetration
                   3.9.3    Market Size and Forecast
        3.10    Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA)
                   3.10.1    Introduction
                   3.10.2    Market Penetration
                   3.10.3    Market Size and Forecast
        3.11    Other Technologies
                   3.11.1    Introduction
                   3.11.2    Market Penetration
                   3.11.3    Market Size and Forecast

    4    Market Dynamics
          4.1    Market Dynamics: Overview
          4.2    Drivers
          4.3    Challenges
          4.4    Opportunities
          4.5    Impact Analysis

    5    Competitive Insights
          5.1    Industrial Microbiological QC Manufacturers by Industrial Areas
          5.2    Market Share Analysis, by Company
                   5.2.1    bioMérieux SA
                   5.2.2    Merck KGaA
                   5.2.3    Market Share Analysis, Becton, Dickinson and Company
                   5.2.4    3M Company
                   5.2.5    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
                   5.2.6    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
                   5.2.7    Danaher Corporation
                   5.2.8    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
                   5.2.9    Market Share Analysis, Sartorius AG
                   5.2.10    Hygiena, LLC
                   5.2.11    Bruker Corporation
                   5.2.12    Qiagen N.V.
                   5.2.13    Shimadzu Corporation
          5.3    Growth Share Matrix
                   5.3.1    Company
                   5.3.2    by Technology
                   5.3.3    by Region
          5.4    Porter’s Five Force Analysis
                   5.4.1    Bargaining Power of Suppliers
                   5.4.2    Bargaining Power of Buyers
                   5.4.3    Threat of New Entrants
                   5.4.4    Threat of Substitutes
                   5.4.5    Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
          5.5    Comprehensive Competitive Index
          5.6    Competitor Value Chain Analysis
          5.7    Competitor Supply Chain Analysis
          5.8    Competitor Brand-Value Matrix

    6    Cost & Pricing Trends
          6.1    Microbiological QC Cost Per Product
          6.2    Microbiological QC Cost Vs Production Cost

    7    Consumer Analysis
          7.1    Overview
          7.2    Product Testing Laboratories
          7.3    Research and Academic Institutions
          7.4    Pharma and Biotech Companies
          7.5    Regulatory and Environment Agencies
          7.6    Food and Beverage Companies
          7.7    Other Industries

    8    Global Industrial Microbiology Market by Application
          8.1    Overview
          8.2    Pharmaceutical Industry
          8.3    Food and Beverage Industry
          8.4    Dairy Industry
          8.5    Agriculture and Fermentation Industry
          8.6    Paper Industry
          8.7    Biotechnology Industry
          8.8    Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Cosmetic and Personal Care Industry
          8.9    Water and Environmental Industry
          8.10    Other Industries

    9    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market by Region
          9.1    Market Overview
          9.2    North America
                   9.2.1    The U.S.
                   9.2.2    Canada
          9.3    Europe
                   9.3.1    Germany
                   9.3.2    France
                   9.3.3    The U.K.
                   9.3.4    Italy
                   9.3.5    Spain
                   9.3.6    Rest-of-Europe
          9.4    Asia-Pacific
                   9.4.1    China
                   9.4.2    Japan
                   9.4.3    India
                   9.4.4    Australia
                   9.4.5    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
          9.5    Latin America
                   9.5.1    Brazil
                   9.5.2    Mexico
                   9.5.3    Rest-of-Latin America
          9.6    Rest-of-the-World

    10    Company Profiles
            10.1    Competitor Snapshot
            10.2    3M Company
                       10.2.1    Company Overview
                       10.2.2    Segmental Information
                       10.2.3    Geographical Information
                       10.2.4    Financial Information
                       10.2.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                       10.2.6    SWOT Analysis
            10.3    Becton, Dickinson and Company
                       10.3.1    Company Overview
                       10.3.2    Segmental Information
                       10.3.3    Geographical Information
                       10.3.4    Financial Information
                       10.3.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                       10.3.6    SWOT Analysis
            10.4    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
                       10.4.1    Company Overview
                       10.4.2    Segmental Information
                       10.4.3    Geographical Information
                       10.4.4    Financial Information
                       10.4.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                       10.4.6    SWOT Analysis
            10.5    Biolog, Inc.
                       10.5.1    Company Overview
                       10.5.2    Segmental Information
                       10.5.3    SWOT Analysis
             10.6    bioMérieux SA
                        10.6.1    Company Overview
                        10.6.2    Segmental Information
                        10.6.3    Geographical Information
                        10.6.4    Financial Information
                        10.6.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.6.6    SWOT Analysis
             10.7    BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH
                        10.7.1    Company Overview
                        10.7.2    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.7.3    SWOT Analysis
             10.8    Bruker Corporation
                        10.8.1    Company Overview
                        10.8.2    Segmental Information
                        10.8.3    Geographical Information
                        10.8.4    Financial Information
                        10.8.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.8.6    SWOT Analysis
             10.9    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
                        10.9.1    Company Overview
                        10.9.2    Segmental Information
                        10.9.3    Geographical Information
                        10.9.4    Financial Information
                        10.9.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.9.6    SWOT Analysis
           10.10    Danaher Corporation
                        10.10.1    Company Overview
                        10.10.2    Segmental Information
                        10.10.3    Geographical Information
                        10.10.4    Financial Information
                        10.10.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.10.6    SWOT Analysis
           10.11    Merck KGaA
                        10.11.1    Company Overview
                        10.11.2    Segmental Information
                        10.11.3    Geographical Information
                        10.11.4    Financial Information
                        10.11.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.11.6    SWOT Analysis
           10.12    Novacyt S.A. (Primerdesign Ltd.)
                        10.12.1    Company Overview
                        10.12.2    Segmental Information
                        10.12.3    Geographical Information
                        10.12.4    Financial Information
                        10.12.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.12.6    SWOT Analysis
           10.13    QIAGEN N.V.
                        10.13.1    Company Overview
                        10.13.2    Segmental Information
                        10.13.3    Geographical Information
                        10.13.4    Financial Information
                        10.13.5    SWOT Analysis
            10.14    R-Biopharm AG
                         10.14.1    Company Overview
                         10.14.2    Company’s Operating Segments
                         10.14.3    SWOT Analysis
            10.15    Sartorius AG
                         10.15.1    Company Overview
                         10.15.2    Segmental Information
                         10.15.3    Geographical Information
                         10.15.4    Financial Information
                         10.15.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                         10.15.6    SWOT Analysis
            10.16    Shimadzu Corporation
                         10.16.1    Company Overview
                         10.16.2    Segmental Information
                         10.16.3    Segmental Information
                         10.16.4    Geographical Information
                         10.16.5    Financial Information
                         10.16.6    Company’s Operating Segments
                         10.16.7    SWOT Analysis
            10.17    Sysmex Corporation
                         10.17.1    Company Overview
                         10.17.2    Segmental Information
                         10.17.3    Geographical Information
                         10.17.4    Financial Information
                         10.17.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                          10.17.6    SWOT Analysis
            10.18    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
                         10.18.1    Company Overview
                         10.18.2    Segmental Information
                         10.18.3    Geographical Information
                         10.18.4    Financial Information
                         10.18.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                         10.18.6    SWOT Analysis

    11    Report scope and methodology
            11.1    Scope of the Report
            11.2    Research Methodology
            11.3    Data Triangulation
                       11.3.1    Key Data Points from Primary Sources
                       11.3.2    Key Data Points from Secondary Sources
            11.4    Bottom-Up Approach (Segmental Analysis)
            11.5    Top-Down Approach (Segmental Analysis)
            11.6    Assumptions and Limitations
            11.7    Data and Prediction Modelling

List of Tables

Table 1:    Industrial Microbiological QC Market Dynamics: Impact Analysis
Table 1.1:    Identity of Objectionable Organisms Cited in Recalls for “Objectionable Organisms” 2004 – 2011
Table 2.1:    Examples of Permissible Limits for Non-Sterile Dosage Forms
Table 2.2:    Difference Between HACCP Plan and FSP
Table 2.3:    Examples of Permissible Limits for Foods
Table 2.4:    Examples of Permissible Limits for Dairy Products
Table 2.5:    Examples of Permissible Limits for Agriculture and Fermentation Products
Table 2.6:    Maximum Containment Level for Drinking Water by the EPA
Table 2.7:    Microbiological Parameters for Drinking Water by the European Council Directive
Table 3.1:    Reagent Cost Comparison Between Traditional and MALDI-TOF MS Methods
Table 3.2:    Direct Cost Comparison Between Traditional and MALDI-TOF MS Methods
Table 3.3:    Total Cost Comparison Between Traditional and MALDI-TOF MS Methods, including Maintenance Agreement Costs
Table 4.1:    Impact Analysis of Market Navigating Factors
Table 4.2:    Impact Analysis of Market Restraining Factors
Table 4.3:    Impact Analysis of Market Opportunities
Table 5.1:    Key Manufacturers by Targeted Industrial Areas
Table 5.2:    Market Share Analysis, by Company (2015 – 2017) ($Million)
Table 5.3:    Ranking of Key Players by Market Share (2015 - 2017)
Table 5.4:    bioMérieux SA Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.5:    Merck KGaA Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.6:    Becton, Dickinson and Company Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.7:    3M Company Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.8:    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.9:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.10:    Danaher Corporation Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.11:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.12:    Sartorius AG Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.13:    Hygiena, LLC Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.14:    Bruker Corporation Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.15:    Qiagen N.V. Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.16:    Shimadzu Corporation Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 6.1:    Microbiological QC Cost (Operating Cost) using Conventional Methods (CM)
Table 6.2:    Microbiological QC Cost (Operating Cost) using Rapid Microbiology Methods (RMMs)
Table 6.3:    Comparison between Rapid Microbial Methods and Conventional Methods
Table 6.4:    Initial Investment for qualification and implementation of RMM Technologies
Table 8.1:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application, 2015-2028
Table 9.1:    The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.2:    The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.3:    The U.S Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.4:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.5:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.6:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028  (Million Units)
Table 9.7:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.8:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.9:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028  (Million Units)
Table 9.10:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.11:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.12:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.13:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.14:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.15:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.16:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.17:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.18:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.19:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.20:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.21:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.22:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.23:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.24:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.25:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.26:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.27:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.28:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.29:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.30:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.31:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.32:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.33:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.34:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.35:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.36:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028  (Million Units)
Table 9.37:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.38:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.39:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.40:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.41:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.42:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028  (Million Units)
Table 9.43:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.44:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.45:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.46:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.47:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.48:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 10.1:    3M Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.2:    3M Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.3:    3M Company: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.4:    Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
Table 10.5:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2016-2018)
Table 10.6:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, by Life Sciences Segment (2016-2018)
Table 10.7:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, by Life Interventional Segment (2016-2018)
Table 10.8:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, by Medical Segment (2016-2018)
Table 10.9:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2016-2018)
Table 10.10:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Overall Financials (2015-2018)
Table 10.11:    Bio-Rad Laboratories: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.12:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.13:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.14:    Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
Table 10.15:    bioMérieux SA: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.16:    bioMérieux SA : Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.17:    bioMérieux SA : Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.18:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.19:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Category (2015-2017)
Table 10.20:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Category (BSI) (2015-2017)
Table 10.21:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Category (BEST) (2015-2017)
Table 10.22:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.23:    Bruker Corporation: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.24:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.25:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.26:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.27:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Reportable Segments
Table 10.28:    Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
Table 10.29:    Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.30:    Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.31:    Danaher Corporation: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.32:    Danaher Corporation: R&D Expenditure, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.33:    Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Product Group (2015-2017)
Table 10.34:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.35:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.36:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography, Healthcare (2015-2017)
Table 10.37:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography, Life Science (2015-2017)
Table 10.38:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography, Performance Materials (2015-2017)
Table 10.39:    Merck KGaA: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.40:    Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
Table 10.41:    Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.42:    Novacyt S.A.:  Segment Revenue, by Region (2017)
Table 10.43:    Novacyt S.A.:  Segment Revenue, by Region (2016)
Table 10.44:    Novacyt S.A.:  Segment Revenue, by Region (2015)
Table 10.45:    Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Table 10.46:    Novacyt S.A.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.47:    QIAGEN N.V.: Net Revenue, by Product Category (2015-2017)
Table 10.48:    QIAGEN N. V.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.49:    QIAGEN N.V.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.50:    Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.51:    Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.52:    Sartorius AG: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.53:    Key Figures (Bioprocess Solutions)
Table 10.54:    Key Figures (Lab Products & Services)
Table 10.55:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.56:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Analytical & Measuring Instruments (2017)
Table 10.57:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Medical Systems (2017)
Table 10.58:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Industrial Machinery (2017)
Table 10.59:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Aircraft Equipment (2017)
Table 10.60:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.61:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography, Analytical & Measuring Instruments (2015-2017)
Table 10.62:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography, Medical Systems (2015-2017)
Table 10.63:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography, Industrial Machinery (2015-2017)
Table 10.64:    Shimadzu Corporation: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.65:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2016-2018)
Table 10.66:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by Americas (2016-2018)
Table 10.67:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by EMEA (2016-2018)
Table 10.68:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by Asia-Pacific (2016-2018)
Table 10.69:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by China (2016-2018)
Table 10.70:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by Japan (2016-2018)
Table 10.71:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2016-2018)
Table 10.72:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Region, by Americas (2016-2018)
Table 10.73:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Region, by EMEA (2016-2018)
Table 10.74:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Region, by Asia-Pacific (2016-2018)
Table 10.75:    Sysmex Corporation: Overall Financials (2016-2018)
Table 10.76:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.77:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.78:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 11.1:    Currency Conversion Rates

List of Figures

Figure 1:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Product Revenue (Overview)
Figure 2:    Promoting and Inhibiting Factors
Figure 3:    Market Share Analysis (2017)
Figure 4:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Product Revenue (Region) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 5:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Product Revenue (Conventional Methods and RMM Technologies) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 6:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Rapid Microbiological Methods (Technology) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 7:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by PCR – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 8:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 9:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by ELFA – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 10:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 11:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Colorimetric Technology – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 12:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 13:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Flow Cytometry – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 14:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 15:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by MALDI-TOF/Mass Spectrometry – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 16:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 17:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Sandwich Hybridization – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 18:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 19:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Fluorescent-Based Technology – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 20:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 21:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Bioluminescence Technology – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 22:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 23:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Membrane Filtration – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 24:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 25:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Others – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 26:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 27:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Revenue (Overview)
Figure 28:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Revenue (Region) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 29:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Volume
Figure 30:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Volume (Region) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 31:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application (Test Revenue) (2018 and 2028)
Figure 32:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application (Test Volume)  (2018 and 2028)
Figure 33:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumers (Product Revenue) (2018 and 2028)
Figure 34:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumers (Test Revenue)  (2018 and 2028)
Figure 35:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumers (Test Volume) (2018 and 2028)
Figure 1.1:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market Segmentation
Figure 1.2:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2018 and 2028
Figure 1.3:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028
Figure 1.4:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028
Figure 1.5:    Global Industrial Microbiology, by Product Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 1.6:    Global Industrial Microbiology, by Test Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 1.7:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028
Figure 1.8:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC, by Test Volume (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 1.9:    Economic Burden to the Company
Figure 1.10:    Recall Cost to the Business
Figure 1.11:    Total recalled products by FDA due to microbial contamination, 2012-2017
Figure 1.12:    Common Causes of Food Products Recalls
Figure 1.13:    Types of Food Product Recalled (U.S. and U.K.)
Figure 1.14:    Number of Recalled Products by U.S. FDA due to Microbial Contamination (2017 and 2018)
Figure 1.15:    Economic Burden of Failed Microbiological QC on Food Industry
Figure 1.16:    U.S. FDA Recalls of Cosmetic and Personal Care Products due to Bacterial Contamination, 2002-2016
Figure 1.17:    Number of Recalled Cosmetic Products due to Microbial Contamination in Europe, 2012-2016
Figure 1.18:    Etiological Agents in Waterborne Outbreaks (Number of Outbreaks/Cause), 1998–2017 (U.S.)
Figure 1.19:    Etiological Agents in Waterborne Outbreaks (Number of Outbreaks/Cause), 1998–2017 (Finland)
Figure 1.20:    Number of Recalled Products by U.S. FDA due to Microbial Contamination (2017 and 2018)
Figure 2.1:    Share of Key Developments and Strategies by Company (Jan-2016 - Dec-2018)
Figure 2.2:    Awards, Recognition, Investments, and Expansions Share by Company
Figure 2.3:    Product Launches and Approvals Share by Company
Figure 2.4:    Collaborations, Partnerships, Joint Venture, and Agreements Share by Company
Figure 2.5:    Mergers and Acquisitions Share by Company
Figure 2.6:    Patent Analysis, by Country (2010 – 2018)
Figure 2.7:    Patent Analysis, by Year (2010 – 2018)
Figure 3.1:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Conventional Culture Based Methods and Rapid Microbiological Methods, 2015-2028
Figure 3.2:    Real-Time PCR: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.3:    Real-Time PCR (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.4:    MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.5:    MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.6:    Bioluminescence Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025,  and 2028)
Figure 3.7:    Bioluminescence Technology (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.8:    Flow Cytometry: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.9:    Flow Cytometry (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.10:    Membrane Filtration: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.11:    Membrane Filtration (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.12:    Fluorescent-based Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.13:    Fluorescent-based Technology (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.14:    Colorimetric Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.15:    Colorimetric Technology (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.16:    Sandwich Hybridization: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.17:    Sandwich Hybridization (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.18:    ELFA Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.19:    Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.20:    Other Technologies: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 4.1:    Market Dynamics
Figure 4.2:    Average Microbiological Quality Control Cost, 2017
Figure 5.1:    Market Share Analysis, by Company (2015 – 2017)
Figure 5.2:    Growth Share Matrix for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Company (2017)
Figure 5.3:    Growth Share Matrix for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Technology (2018)
Figure 5.4:    Growth Share Matrix for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Region (2018)
Figure 5.5:    Industry Attractiveness (Porter’s Five Forces Analysis)
Figure 5.6:    Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Overall Impact
Figure 5.7:    Bargaining Power of Buyers: Overall Impact
Figure 5.8:    Threat of New Entrants: Overall Impact
Figure 5.9:    Threat of Substitutes: Overall Impact
Figure 5.10:    Intensity of Competitive Rivalry: Overall Impact
Figure 5.11:    Comprehensive Competitive Index for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Company (2017)
Figure 5.12:    Key Entities of Value Chain
Figure 5.13:    Value Chain Analysis
Figure 5.14:    Cost Margin (Value Chain Analysis)
Figure 5.15:    Supply Chain
Figure 5.16:    Key Entities of Supply Chain
Figure 5.17:    End to End Supply Chain
Figure 5.18:    Brand-Value Matrix
Figure 6.1:    Average Production and Microbiological QC Cost Breakdown by Common Industrial Process Requirements
Figure 7.1:    Industrial Microbiological QC Market Consumer Analysis
Figure 7.2:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue), 2015 – 2028
Figure 7.3:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue), 2015 – 2028
Figure 7.4:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume), 2015-2028
Figure 7.5:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.6:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.7:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Product Testing Laboratories), 2015-2028
Figure 7.8:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue, by Product Testing Laboratories) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.9:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Product Testing Laboratories) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.10:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Research & Academic Institutions), 2015-2028
Figure 7.11:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue, by Research & Academic Institutions) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.12:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Research & Academic Institutions) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.13:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Pharma & Biotech Companies), 2015-2028
Figure 7.14:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue, by Pharma & Biotech Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.15:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Pharma & Biotech Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.16:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Regulatory & Environment Agencies), 2015-2028
Figure 7.17:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis  (Test Revenue, by Regulatory & Environment Agencies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.18:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Regulatory & Environment Agencies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.19:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Food & Beverage Companies), 2015-2028
Figure 7.20:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Food & Beverage Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.21:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Food & Beverage Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.22:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Other Industries), 2015-2028
Figure 7.23:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis  (Test Revenue, by Other Industries) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.24:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Other Industries) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 8.1:    Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application
Figure 8.2:    Industrial Microbiological QC Market Share, by Application, 2018 and 2028
Figure 8.3:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Pharmaceutical Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.4:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Pharmaceutical Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.5:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Food and Beverage Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.6:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Food and Beverage Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.7:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Dairy Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.8:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Dairy Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.9:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Agriculture and Fermentation Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.10:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Agriculture and Fermentation Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.11:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Paper Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.12:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Paper Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.13:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Biotechnology Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.14:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Biotechnology Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.15:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Cosmetic and Personal Care Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.16:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Cosmetic and Personal Care Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.17:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Water and Environmental Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.18:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Water and Environmental Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.19:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Other Industries), 2015-2028
Figure 8.20:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Other Industries), 2015-2028
Figure 9.1:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 9.2:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 9.3:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 9.4:    North America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
Figure 9.5:    North America Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.6:    North America Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.7:    The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.8    The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.9:    The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.10:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.11:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.12:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.13:    Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
Figure 9.14:    Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.15:    Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer),  2015-2028
Figure 9.16:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.17:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.18:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.19:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.20:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.21:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.22:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.23:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.24:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.25:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.26:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.27:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.28:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.29:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.30:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.31:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.32:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.33:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.34:    Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
Figure 9.35:    Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.36:    Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.37:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.38:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.39:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.40:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.41:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.42:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.43:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.44:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.45:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.46:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.47:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.48:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.49:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.50:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.51:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.52:    Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
Figure 9.53:    Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.54:    Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.55:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.56:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.57:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.58:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.59:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.60:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.61:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.62:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.63:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.64:    Rest-of-the-World Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
Figure 9.65:    Rest-of-the-World Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.66:    Rest-of-the-World Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 10.1:    3M Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.2:    3M Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.3:    3M Company: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.4:    3M Company: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.5:    3M Company: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.6:    3M Company: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.7:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2018)
Figure 10.8:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2018)
Figure 10.9:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2015-2018)
Figure 10.10:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: R&D Expenditure & Y-o-Y (2015-2018)
Figure 10.11:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.12:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.13:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.14:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.15:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.16:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.17:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.18:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.19:    Biolog, Inc.: Operating Segments
Figure 10.20:    Biolog, Inc.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.21:    bioMérieux SA : Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.22:    bioMérieux SA: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.23:    bioMérieux SA: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.24:    bioMérieux SA: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.25:    bioMérieux SA: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.26:    bioMérieux SA: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.27:    BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.28:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.29:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.30:    Bruker Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.31:    Bruker Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.32:    Bruker Corporation: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.33:    Bruker Corporation: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.34:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.35:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.36:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.37:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.38:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.39:    Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.40:    Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.41:    Danaher Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.42:    Danaher Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.43:    Danaher Corporation: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.44:    Danaher Corporation: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.45:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.46:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.47:    Merck KGaA: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.48:    Merck KGaA: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.49:    Merck KGaA: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.50:    Merck KGaA: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.51:    Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.52:    Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.53:    Novacyt S.A.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.54:    Novacyt S.A.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.55:    Novacyt S.A.: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.56:    Novacyt S.A.: Company Timeline
Figure 10.57:    Novacyt S.A.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.58:    QIAGEN N.V.: Net Revenue, by Product Categories (2017)
Figure 10.59:    QIAGEN N.V.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.60:    QIAGEN N.V.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.61:    QIAGEN N.V.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.62:    QIAGEN N.V.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.63:    R-Biopharm AG: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.64:    Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.65:    Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.66:    Sartorius AG: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.67:    Sartorius AG: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.68:    Sartorius AG: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.69:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.70:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.71:    Shimadzu Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.72:    Shimadzu Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.73:    Shimadzu Corporation: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.74:    Shimadzu Corporation: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.75:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2018)
Figure 10.76:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2018)
Figure 10.77:    Sysmex Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2015-2018)
Figure 10.78:    Sysmex Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2016-2018)
Figure 10.79:    Sysmex Corporation: Operating Segments (2018)
Figure 10.80:    Sysmex Corporation: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.81:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.82:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.83:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.84:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.85:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.86:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 11.1:    Considered Factors for Data Prediction and Modeling

Product safety is a global concern and is becoming evident among the general public. The governmental regulators and product manufacturers are keenly focused on maintaining the optimum quality of the products. The manufacturers are subjected to a stringent level of regulations to guarantee the microbiological quality control and composition of the product.  The microbial quality control tests are carried out throughout the production process, from the initial stage of raw material till the dispatch of the product. The environment of the production process is also monitored at regular intervals using the microbiological tests. Several technological advancements have been made in the field of industrial microbiology, those of which include the introduction of Rapid Microbiological Methods (RMMs). RMM technologies allow quicker detection, but often require a short enrichment stage before the microbiological screening.

A wide range of techniques have been applied to develop these rapid microbiological test methods are aimed at quantifying the product quality parameters. RMMs can help in saving a significant amount of time in the quality control procedure of the industrial process, though a common barrier in the adoption of this technology is the high cost associated with the technology. RMMs are expanding their application area and are now being looked upon by the microbiologists as a viable alternative to the traditional methods.

The global industrial microbiological QC market has been witnessing a steady growth. The market is expected to continue to grow with a single digit CAGR of 6.22% during the forecast period, 2019-2028. Growing at a CAGR of 4.70% during the forecast period of 2019-2028, the conventional culture-based methods segment is anticipated to generate a value of $793.1 million in 2028. However, the market for rapid microbiological methods currently dominates the global industrial microbiological QC market, and is anticipated to grow at the fastest CAGR of 7.33% during the forecast period 2019-2028.

The purpose of the study is to gain a holistic view of the global industrial microbiological QC market in terms of various factors, such as recent trends and product advancements, influencing the market. The scope of this report is centered upon conducting a detailed study of the products allied with the global industrial microbiological QC market, which includes various products, broadly classified as rapid microbiological methods and conventional culture-based methods. However, the market estimation only comprises manufacturers of these products. The global industrial microbiological QC market is segmented into four different segments namely technology, consumers, applications, and regions. These segments are further segmented into several sub-segments to ease the market estimation and to gain a holistic view of the market. The market has also been broadly segmented into product revenue, testing revenue, and testing volume with respect to the consumers and applications that are present in the market. The global market value was estimated using different approaches and validated with each other.

Based on region, the global industrial microbiological QC market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Rest-of-the-World (RoW). The regions have further been analyzed for product revenues, testing revenues, and testing volumes of the various products and processes present in the market.

The key manufacturers who have been contributing significantly to the global industrial microbiological QC market include 3M Company, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Biolog, Inc., bioMérieux SA, BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH, Bruker Corporation, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Danaher Corporation, Merck KGaA, Novacyt S.A. (Primerdesign Ltd.), QIAGEN N.V., R-Biopharm AG, Sartorius AG, Shimadzu Corporation, Sysmex Corporation, and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., among others.

We understand that your business need specific answers pertaining to the market. And , therefore, we do provide customised research tailored to your need.

With the purchase of this report, you are entitled to certain degree of free customisation within the scope of the study.

Do get in touch to help us understand how we can serve u better with a custom solution to your research needs. We assure quick turnaround for your pressing business requirements.

Contact Information


Name *
Email *
 
Company Name *
Designation
 
 
Contact No. *
Other Details
 
 

Write the characters in the image above
 
 
* Required Fields
 

Over the past few decades, companies have invested in the quality control of the production process, equipment, and training for product testing. These investments and resulting improvements are not consistent for all the industries. However, the increasing globalization of the supply of the products continues to drive immense changes and improvements in the overall industrial microbiological QC market. Although microbiological testing is reasonably spread around the world, testing practices within various geographic regions vary significantly. Automation provides significant time and cost savings, while also reducing the potential of human error. It also enables the provision of consistently reliable and accurate results. There are commercially available automated and semi-automated systems that are based on several technologies such as real-time PCR, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, flow cytometry, bioluminescence technology, and Enzyme-linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA), among others. Most of these technologies are aimed at providing efficiency gains when compared to traditional laboratory technologies, and therefore have significant potential for both time and cost savings. Hence, these technologies are adopted for the detection and identification of pathogens and other micro-organisms in the manufacturing process of industries, to avoid the further chances of the product recalls.

The purpose of the study is to gain a holistic view of the global industrial microbiological QC market in terms of various factors, including regulatory reforms and technological advancements, which are influencing the market. The market has been segmented into ‘applications’, ‘technologies’, ‘consumers’, and ‘regions’. The scope of this report is centered upon conducting a detailed study of the products allied with the global industrial microbiological QC market. The market has also been broadly classified into product revenue, testing revenue, and testing volume for each of the aforementioned segments. In addition, the study also includes the exhaustive information on the unmet needs, perception on the new products, competitive landscape, market share of leading manufacturers, growth potential of application, technology, consumer, region, and companies, as well as other vital information with respect to global industrial microbiological QC market. The report presents the reader with an opportunity to unlock comprehensive insights with respect to the market and helps in forming well-informed strategic decisions. The research uncovers some of the substantial parameters that must be taken into consideration before entering into the market.

This research report aims at answering various aspects of the global industrial microbiological QC market with the help of the key factors driving the market, the restraints, and the current growth opportunities that are going to shape the future trajectory of the market expansion. The report includes an in-depth examination of the key players and recent developments taking place in this market. Moreover, the report includes chapters on market dynamics (market drivers, opportunities, and challenges) and industry analysis as well.

The research study highlights the factors governing the industry attractiveness with Porter’s Five Forces for a comprehensive understanding of the global industrial microbiological QC market. Moreover, the study includes detailed product mapping, market estimation, and analysis of key trends in multiple geographical regions, growth of global industrial microbiological QC market in each region for different applications, and the key strategies and developments by the prominent manufacturers.

The answers to the following key questions can be derived from this report:

•    What are the major market drivers, challenges, and opportunities in the global industrial microbiological QC market?
•    What are the underlying structures resulting in the emerging trends within the global industrial microbiological QC market?
•    How is each segment of the global industrial microbiological QC market expected to grow during the forecast period and what is the anticipated revenue generated by each of the segments by the end of 2028?
•   What are the key developmental strategies which are implemented by the major players in order to sustain in the competitive market? What are the key standardization implications in developed regions for industrial microbiological QC products?
•    What are the countermeasures in case of failing QC procedures for each industry? 
•    What are the key success factors for companies to remain relevant and competitive in this crowded market? 
•    Who are the leading players with significant offerings to the global industrial microbiological QC market? What is the current market dominance for each of these leading players?
•   What is the expected compound growth rate witnessed by the leading players in the market during the forecast period 2019-2028? Which industrial microbiology QC product type is anticipated to have the most promising growth? 
•    What are the key applications in the global industrial microbiological QC market? What are the major segments of these applications? What technologies are dominating these application segments?
•    What are the major technologies that are employed in the global industrial microbiological QC market? Which is the dominating technology?
•    Who are the primary consumers of the global industrial microbiological QC market? Which is the fastest growing consumer segment in the global industrial microbiological QC market?
•   Who are the key manufacturers in the global industrial microbiological QC market, and what are their contributions? Also, what is the growth potential of each major manufacturer?
•    What is the scope of the global industrial microbiological QC market in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Rest-of-the-World?

The key manufacturers who have been contributing significantly to the global industrial microbiological QC market include 3M Company, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Biolog, Inc., bioMérieux SA, BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH, Bruker Corporation, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Danaher Corporation, Merck KGaA, Novacyt S.A. (Primerdesign Ltd.), QIAGEN N.V., R-Biopharm AG, Sartorius AG, Shimadzu Corporation, Sysmex Corporation, and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., among others.

    Executive Summary    
    1    Market Overview
          1.1    Market Introduction
          1.2    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market Overview
          1.3    Economic Burden of the Failed Microbiological QC
                   1.3.1    Pharmaceutical Industry
                   1.3.2    Food, Beverage, Agriculture & Fermentation Industry
                   1.3.3    Cosmetic Industry
                   1.3.4    Water Industry
                   1.3.5    Paper Industry
                   1.3.6    Biotechnology Industry
                   1.3.7    Other Industries

    2    Industry Insights
          2.1    Key Developments and Strategies
                   2.1.1    Awards, Recognition, Investments, and Expansions
                   2.1.2    Product Launches and Approvals
                   2.1.3    Collaborations, Partnerships, Joint Venture, and Agreements
                   2.1.4    Mergers and Acquisitions
          2.2    Legal Requirements and Regulations
                   2.2.1    Microbiology Standards
                   2.2.2    Pharmaceutical Industry
                               2.2.2.1    FDA Guidance
                               2.2.2.2    EU Directives
                               2.2.2.3    Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
                   2.2.3    Food and Beverage Industry
                               2.2.3.1    FDA Guidance
                               2.2.3.2    EU Directive
                               2.2.3.3    Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
                   2.2.4    Dairy Industry
                               2.2.4.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.4.2    EU Directive
                               2.2.4.3    Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
                   2.2.5    Agriculture and Fermentation Industry
                               2.2.5.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.5.2    EU Directive
                               2.2.5.3    Permissible Limits for Microorganisms
                   2.2.6    Paper Industry
                               2.2.6.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.6.2    EU Directive
                   2.2.7    Biotechnology Industry
                               2.2.7.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.7.2    EU Directive
                   2.2.8    Cosmetic Industry
                               2.2.8.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.8.2    EU Directive
                  2.2.9    Water Industry
                               2.2.9.1    FDA Guidelines
                               2.2.9.2    EU Directives
         2.3    Patent Analysis
                  2.3.1    by Country
                  2.3.2    by Year

    3    Technology Trends
          3.1    Introduction
          3.2    Real-Time PCR
                   3.2.1    Introduction
                   3.2.2    Market Penetration
          3.3    MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
                   3.3.1    Introduction
                   3.3.2    Market Penetration
                   3.3.3    Market Size and Forecast
          3.4    Bioluminescence Technology
                   3.4.1    Introduction
                   3.4.2    Market Penetration
          3.5    Flow Cytometry
                   3.5.1    Introduction
                   3.5.2    Market Penetration
                   3.5.3    Market Size and Forecast
          3.6    Membrane Filtration
                   3.6.1    Introduction
                   3.6.2    Market Penetration
                   3.6.3    Market Size and Forecast
          3.7    Fluorescent-based Technology
                   3.7.1    Introduction
                   3.7.2    Market Penetration
                   3.7.3    Market Size and Forecast
          3.8    Colorimetric Technology
                   3.8.1    Colorimetric Technology: Introduction
                   3.8.2    Market Penetration
                   3.8.3    Market Size and Forecast
          3.9    Sandwich Hybridization
                   3.9.1    Introduction
                   3.9.2    Market Penetration
                   3.9.3    Market Size and Forecast
        3.10    Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA)
                   3.10.1    Introduction
                   3.10.2    Market Penetration
                   3.10.3    Market Size and Forecast
        3.11    Other Technologies
                   3.11.1    Introduction
                   3.11.2    Market Penetration
                   3.11.3    Market Size and Forecast

    4    Market Dynamics
          4.1    Market Dynamics: Overview
          4.2    Drivers
          4.3    Challenges
          4.4    Opportunities
          4.5    Impact Analysis

    5    Competitive Insights
          5.1    Industrial Microbiological QC Manufacturers by Industrial Areas
          5.2    Market Share Analysis, by Company
                   5.2.1    bioMérieux SA
                   5.2.2    Merck KGaA
                   5.2.3    Market Share Analysis, Becton, Dickinson and Company
                   5.2.4    3M Company
                   5.2.5    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
                   5.2.6    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
                   5.2.7    Danaher Corporation
                   5.2.8    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
                   5.2.9    Market Share Analysis, Sartorius AG
                   5.2.10    Hygiena, LLC
                   5.2.11    Bruker Corporation
                   5.2.12    Qiagen N.V.
                   5.2.13    Shimadzu Corporation
          5.3    Growth Share Matrix
                   5.3.1    Company
                   5.3.2    by Technology
                   5.3.3    by Region
          5.4    Porter’s Five Force Analysis
                   5.4.1    Bargaining Power of Suppliers
                   5.4.2    Bargaining Power of Buyers
                   5.4.3    Threat of New Entrants
                   5.4.4    Threat of Substitutes
                   5.4.5    Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
          5.5    Comprehensive Competitive Index
          5.6    Competitor Value Chain Analysis
          5.7    Competitor Supply Chain Analysis
          5.8    Competitor Brand-Value Matrix

    6    Cost & Pricing Trends
          6.1    Microbiological QC Cost Per Product
          6.2    Microbiological QC Cost Vs Production Cost

    7    Consumer Analysis
          7.1    Overview
          7.2    Product Testing Laboratories
          7.3    Research and Academic Institutions
          7.4    Pharma and Biotech Companies
          7.5    Regulatory and Environment Agencies
          7.6    Food and Beverage Companies
          7.7    Other Industries

    8    Global Industrial Microbiology Market by Application
          8.1    Overview
          8.2    Pharmaceutical Industry
          8.3    Food and Beverage Industry
          8.4    Dairy Industry
          8.5    Agriculture and Fermentation Industry
          8.6    Paper Industry
          8.7    Biotechnology Industry
          8.8    Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Cosmetic and Personal Care Industry
          8.9    Water and Environmental Industry
          8.10    Other Industries

    9    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market by Region
          9.1    Market Overview
          9.2    North America
                   9.2.1    The U.S.
                   9.2.2    Canada
          9.3    Europe
                   9.3.1    Germany
                   9.3.2    France
                   9.3.3    The U.K.
                   9.3.4    Italy
                   9.3.5    Spain
                   9.3.6    Rest-of-Europe
          9.4    Asia-Pacific
                   9.4.1    China
                   9.4.2    Japan
                   9.4.3    India
                   9.4.4    Australia
                   9.4.5    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific
          9.5    Latin America
                   9.5.1    Brazil
                   9.5.2    Mexico
                   9.5.3    Rest-of-Latin America
          9.6    Rest-of-the-World

    10    Company Profiles
            10.1    Competitor Snapshot
            10.2    3M Company
                       10.2.1    Company Overview
                       10.2.2    Segmental Information
                       10.2.3    Geographical Information
                       10.2.4    Financial Information
                       10.2.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                       10.2.6    SWOT Analysis
            10.3    Becton, Dickinson and Company
                       10.3.1    Company Overview
                       10.3.2    Segmental Information
                       10.3.3    Geographical Information
                       10.3.4    Financial Information
                       10.3.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                       10.3.6    SWOT Analysis
            10.4    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
                       10.4.1    Company Overview
                       10.4.2    Segmental Information
                       10.4.3    Geographical Information
                       10.4.4    Financial Information
                       10.4.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                       10.4.6    SWOT Analysis
            10.5    Biolog, Inc.
                       10.5.1    Company Overview
                       10.5.2    Segmental Information
                       10.5.3    SWOT Analysis
             10.6    bioMérieux SA
                        10.6.1    Company Overview
                        10.6.2    Segmental Information
                        10.6.3    Geographical Information
                        10.6.4    Financial Information
                        10.6.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.6.6    SWOT Analysis
             10.7    BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH
                        10.7.1    Company Overview
                        10.7.2    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.7.3    SWOT Analysis
             10.8    Bruker Corporation
                        10.8.1    Company Overview
                        10.8.2    Segmental Information
                        10.8.3    Geographical Information
                        10.8.4    Financial Information
                        10.8.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.8.6    SWOT Analysis
             10.9    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
                        10.9.1    Company Overview
                        10.9.2    Segmental Information
                        10.9.3    Geographical Information
                        10.9.4    Financial Information
                        10.9.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.9.6    SWOT Analysis
           10.10    Danaher Corporation
                        10.10.1    Company Overview
                        10.10.2    Segmental Information
                        10.10.3    Geographical Information
                        10.10.4    Financial Information
                        10.10.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.10.6    SWOT Analysis
           10.11    Merck KGaA
                        10.11.1    Company Overview
                        10.11.2    Segmental Information
                        10.11.3    Geographical Information
                        10.11.4    Financial Information
                        10.11.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.11.6    SWOT Analysis
           10.12    Novacyt S.A. (Primerdesign Ltd.)
                        10.12.1    Company Overview
                        10.12.2    Segmental Information
                        10.12.3    Geographical Information
                        10.12.4    Financial Information
                        10.12.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                        10.12.6    SWOT Analysis
           10.13    QIAGEN N.V.
                        10.13.1    Company Overview
                        10.13.2    Segmental Information
                        10.13.3    Geographical Information
                        10.13.4    Financial Information
                        10.13.5    SWOT Analysis
            10.14    R-Biopharm AG
                         10.14.1    Company Overview
                         10.14.2    Company’s Operating Segments
                         10.14.3    SWOT Analysis
            10.15    Sartorius AG
                         10.15.1    Company Overview
                         10.15.2    Segmental Information
                         10.15.3    Geographical Information
                         10.15.4    Financial Information
                         10.15.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                         10.15.6    SWOT Analysis
            10.16    Shimadzu Corporation
                         10.16.1    Company Overview
                         10.16.2    Segmental Information
                         10.16.3    Segmental Information
                         10.16.4    Geographical Information
                         10.16.5    Financial Information
                         10.16.6    Company’s Operating Segments
                         10.16.7    SWOT Analysis
            10.17    Sysmex Corporation
                         10.17.1    Company Overview
                         10.17.2    Segmental Information
                         10.17.3    Geographical Information
                         10.17.4    Financial Information
                         10.17.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                          10.17.6    SWOT Analysis
            10.18    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
                         10.18.1    Company Overview
                         10.18.2    Segmental Information
                         10.18.3    Geographical Information
                         10.18.4    Financial Information
                         10.18.5    Company’s Operating Segments
                         10.18.6    SWOT Analysis

    11    Report scope and methodology
            11.1    Scope of the Report
            11.2    Research Methodology
            11.3    Data Triangulation
                       11.3.1    Key Data Points from Primary Sources
                       11.3.2    Key Data Points from Secondary Sources
            11.4    Bottom-Up Approach (Segmental Analysis)
            11.5    Top-Down Approach (Segmental Analysis)
            11.6    Assumptions and Limitations
            11.7    Data and Prediction Modelling

List of Tables

Table 1:    Industrial Microbiological QC Market Dynamics: Impact Analysis
Table 1.1:    Identity of Objectionable Organisms Cited in Recalls for “Objectionable Organisms” 2004 – 2011
Table 2.1:    Examples of Permissible Limits for Non-Sterile Dosage Forms
Table 2.2:    Difference Between HACCP Plan and FSP
Table 2.3:    Examples of Permissible Limits for Foods
Table 2.4:    Examples of Permissible Limits for Dairy Products
Table 2.5:    Examples of Permissible Limits for Agriculture and Fermentation Products
Table 2.6:    Maximum Containment Level for Drinking Water by the EPA
Table 2.7:    Microbiological Parameters for Drinking Water by the European Council Directive
Table 3.1:    Reagent Cost Comparison Between Traditional and MALDI-TOF MS Methods
Table 3.2:    Direct Cost Comparison Between Traditional and MALDI-TOF MS Methods
Table 3.3:    Total Cost Comparison Between Traditional and MALDI-TOF MS Methods, including Maintenance Agreement Costs
Table 4.1:    Impact Analysis of Market Navigating Factors
Table 4.2:    Impact Analysis of Market Restraining Factors
Table 4.3:    Impact Analysis of Market Opportunities
Table 5.1:    Key Manufacturers by Targeted Industrial Areas
Table 5.2:    Market Share Analysis, by Company (2015 – 2017) ($Million)
Table 5.3:    Ranking of Key Players by Market Share (2015 - 2017)
Table 5.4:    bioMérieux SA Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.5:    Merck KGaA Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.6:    Becton, Dickinson and Company Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.7:    3M Company Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.8:    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.9:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.10:    Danaher Corporation Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.11:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.12:    Sartorius AG Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.13:    Hygiena, LLC Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.14:    Bruker Corporation Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.15:    Qiagen N.V. Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 5.16:    Shimadzu Corporation Market Share (2015 – 2017)
Table 6.1:    Microbiological QC Cost (Operating Cost) using Conventional Methods (CM)
Table 6.2:    Microbiological QC Cost (Operating Cost) using Rapid Microbiology Methods (RMMs)
Table 6.3:    Comparison between Rapid Microbial Methods and Conventional Methods
Table 6.4:    Initial Investment for qualification and implementation of RMM Technologies
Table 8.1:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application, 2015-2028
Table 9.1:    The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.2:    The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.3:    The U.S Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.4:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.5:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.6:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028  (Million Units)
Table 9.7:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.8:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.9:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028  (Million Units)
Table 9.10:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.11:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.12:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.13:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.14:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.15:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.16:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.17:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.18:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.19:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.20:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.21:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.22:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.23:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.24:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.25:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.26:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.27:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.28:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.29:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.30:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.31:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.32:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.33:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.34:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.35:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.36:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028  (Million Units)
Table 9.37:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.38:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.39:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.40:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.41:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.42:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028  (Million Units)
Table 9.43:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.44:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.45:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 9.46:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.47:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028 ($Million)
Table 9.48:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028 (Million Units)
Table 10.1:    3M Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.2:    3M Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.3:    3M Company: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.4:    Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
Table 10.5:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2016-2018)
Table 10.6:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, by Life Sciences Segment (2016-2018)
Table 10.7:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, by Life Interventional Segment (2016-2018)
Table 10.8:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, by Medical Segment (2016-2018)
Table 10.9:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2016-2018)
Table 10.10:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Overall Financials (2015-2018)
Table 10.11:    Bio-Rad Laboratories: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.12:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.13:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.14:    Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
Table 10.15:    bioMérieux SA: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.16:    bioMérieux SA : Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.17:    bioMérieux SA : Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.18:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.19:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Category (2015-2017)
Table 10.20:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Category (BSI) (2015-2017)
Table 10.21:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Category (BEST) (2015-2017)
Table 10.22:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.23:    Bruker Corporation: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.24:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.25:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.26:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.27:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Reportable Segments
Table 10.28:    Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
Table 10.29:    Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.30:    Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.31:    Danaher Corporation: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.32:    Danaher Corporation: R&D Expenditure, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.33:    Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Product Group (2015-2017)
Table 10.34:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.35:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.36:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography, Healthcare (2015-2017)
Table 10.37:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography, Life Science (2015-2017)
Table 10.38:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography, Performance Materials (2015-2017)
Table 10.39:    Merck KGaA: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.40:    Key Figures: by Segments (2017)
Table 10.41:    Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.42:    Novacyt S.A.:  Segment Revenue, by Region (2017)
Table 10.43:    Novacyt S.A.:  Segment Revenue, by Region (2016)
Table 10.44:    Novacyt S.A.:  Segment Revenue, by Region (2015)
Table 10.45:    Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Table 10.46:    Novacyt S.A.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.47:    QIAGEN N.V.: Net Revenue, by Product Category (2015-2017)
Table 10.48:    QIAGEN N. V.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.49:    QIAGEN N.V.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.50:    Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.51:    Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.52:    Sartorius AG: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.53:    Key Figures (Bioprocess Solutions)
Table 10.54:    Key Figures (Lab Products & Services)
Table 10.55:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.56:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Analytical & Measuring Instruments (2017)
Table 10.57:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Medical Systems (2017)
Table 10.58:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Industrial Machinery (2017)
Table 10.59:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Sub-Segment, Aircraft Equipment (2017)
Table 10.60:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.61:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography, Analytical & Measuring Instruments (2015-2017)
Table 10.62:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography, Medical Systems (2015-2017)
Table 10.63:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography, Industrial Machinery (2015-2017)
Table 10.64:    Shimadzu Corporation: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 10.65:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2016-2018)
Table 10.66:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by Americas (2016-2018)
Table 10.67:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by EMEA (2016-2018)
Table 10.68:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by Asia-Pacific (2016-2018)
Table 10.69:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by China (2016-2018)
Table 10.70:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Business Type, by Japan (2016-2018)
Table 10.71:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2016-2018)
Table 10.72:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Region, by Americas (2016-2018)
Table 10.73:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Region, by EMEA (2016-2018)
Table 10.74:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Region, by Asia-Pacific (2016-2018)
Table 10.75:    Sysmex Corporation: Overall Financials (2016-2018)
Table 10.76:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2015-2017)
Table 10.77:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2015-2017)
Table 10.78:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Overall Financials (2015-2017)
Table 11.1:    Currency Conversion Rates

List of Figures

Figure 1:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Product Revenue (Overview)
Figure 2:    Promoting and Inhibiting Factors
Figure 3:    Market Share Analysis (2017)
Figure 4:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Product Revenue (Region) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 5:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Product Revenue (Conventional Methods and RMM Technologies) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 6:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Rapid Microbiological Methods (Technology) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 7:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by PCR – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 8:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 9:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by ELFA – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 10:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 11:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Colorimetric Technology – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 12:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 13:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Flow Cytometry – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 14:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 15:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by MALDI-TOF/Mass Spectrometry – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 16:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 17:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Sandwich Hybridization – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 18:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 19:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Fluorescent-Based Technology – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 20:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 21:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Bioluminescence Technology – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 22:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 23:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Membrane Filtration – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 24:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 25:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Others – RMM Technologies (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 26:    Market Penetration Forecast
Figure 27:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Revenue (Overview)
Figure 28:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Revenue (Region) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 29:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Volume
Figure 30:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Test Volume (Region) (2015, 2018, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 31:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application (Test Revenue) (2018 and 2028)
Figure 32:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application (Test Volume)  (2018 and 2028)
Figure 33:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumers (Product Revenue) (2018 and 2028)
Figure 34:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumers (Test Revenue)  (2018 and 2028)
Figure 35:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumers (Test Volume) (2018 and 2028)
Figure 1.1:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market Segmentation
Figure 1.2:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2018 and 2028
Figure 1.3:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2015-2028
Figure 1.4:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2015-2028
Figure 1.5:    Global Industrial Microbiology, by Product Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 1.6:    Global Industrial Microbiology, by Test Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 1.7:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2015-2028
Figure 1.8:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC, by Test Volume (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 1.9:    Economic Burden to the Company
Figure 1.10:    Recall Cost to the Business
Figure 1.11:    Total recalled products by FDA due to microbial contamination, 2012-2017
Figure 1.12:    Common Causes of Food Products Recalls
Figure 1.13:    Types of Food Product Recalled (U.S. and U.K.)
Figure 1.14:    Number of Recalled Products by U.S. FDA due to Microbial Contamination (2017 and 2018)
Figure 1.15:    Economic Burden of Failed Microbiological QC on Food Industry
Figure 1.16:    U.S. FDA Recalls of Cosmetic and Personal Care Products due to Bacterial Contamination, 2002-2016
Figure 1.17:    Number of Recalled Cosmetic Products due to Microbial Contamination in Europe, 2012-2016
Figure 1.18:    Etiological Agents in Waterborne Outbreaks (Number of Outbreaks/Cause), 1998–2017 (U.S.)
Figure 1.19:    Etiological Agents in Waterborne Outbreaks (Number of Outbreaks/Cause), 1998–2017 (Finland)
Figure 1.20:    Number of Recalled Products by U.S. FDA due to Microbial Contamination (2017 and 2018)
Figure 2.1:    Share of Key Developments and Strategies by Company (Jan-2016 - Dec-2018)
Figure 2.2:    Awards, Recognition, Investments, and Expansions Share by Company
Figure 2.3:    Product Launches and Approvals Share by Company
Figure 2.4:    Collaborations, Partnerships, Joint Venture, and Agreements Share by Company
Figure 2.5:    Mergers and Acquisitions Share by Company
Figure 2.6:    Patent Analysis, by Country (2010 – 2018)
Figure 2.7:    Patent Analysis, by Year (2010 – 2018)
Figure 3.1:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Conventional Culture Based Methods and Rapid Microbiological Methods, 2015-2028
Figure 3.2:    Real-Time PCR: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.3:    Real-Time PCR (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.4:    MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.5:    MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.6:    Bioluminescence Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025,  and 2028)
Figure 3.7:    Bioluminescence Technology (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.8:    Flow Cytometry: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.9:    Flow Cytometry (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.10:    Membrane Filtration: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.11:    Membrane Filtration (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.12:    Fluorescent-based Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.13:    Fluorescent-based Technology (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.14:    Colorimetric Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.15:    Colorimetric Technology (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.16:    Sandwich Hybridization: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.17:    Sandwich Hybridization (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.18:    ELFA Technology: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 3.19:    Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay (by Technology Revenue), 2015-2028
Figure 3.20:    Other Technologies: Market Penetration (2015, 2018, 2022, 2025, and 2028)
Figure 4.1:    Market Dynamics
Figure 4.2:    Average Microbiological Quality Control Cost, 2017
Figure 5.1:    Market Share Analysis, by Company (2015 – 2017)
Figure 5.2:    Growth Share Matrix for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Company (2017)
Figure 5.3:    Growth Share Matrix for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Technology (2018)
Figure 5.4:    Growth Share Matrix for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Region (2018)
Figure 5.5:    Industry Attractiveness (Porter’s Five Forces Analysis)
Figure 5.6:    Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Overall Impact
Figure 5.7:    Bargaining Power of Buyers: Overall Impact
Figure 5.8:    Threat of New Entrants: Overall Impact
Figure 5.9:    Threat of Substitutes: Overall Impact
Figure 5.10:    Intensity of Competitive Rivalry: Overall Impact
Figure 5.11:    Comprehensive Competitive Index for Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Company (2017)
Figure 5.12:    Key Entities of Value Chain
Figure 5.13:    Value Chain Analysis
Figure 5.14:    Cost Margin (Value Chain Analysis)
Figure 5.15:    Supply Chain
Figure 5.16:    Key Entities of Supply Chain
Figure 5.17:    End to End Supply Chain
Figure 5.18:    Brand-Value Matrix
Figure 6.1:    Average Production and Microbiological QC Cost Breakdown by Common Industrial Process Requirements
Figure 7.1:    Industrial Microbiological QC Market Consumer Analysis
Figure 7.2:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue), 2015 – 2028
Figure 7.3:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue), 2015 – 2028
Figure 7.4:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume), 2015-2028
Figure 7.5:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.6:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.7:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Product Testing Laboratories), 2015-2028
Figure 7.8:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue, by Product Testing Laboratories) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.9:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Product Testing Laboratories) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.10:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Research & Academic Institutions), 2015-2028
Figure 7.11:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue, by Research & Academic Institutions) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.12:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Research & Academic Institutions) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.13:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Pharma & Biotech Companies), 2015-2028
Figure 7.14:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Revenue, by Pharma & Biotech Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.15:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Pharma & Biotech Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.16:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Regulatory & Environment Agencies), 2015-2028
Figure 7.17:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis  (Test Revenue, by Regulatory & Environment Agencies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.18:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Regulatory & Environment Agencies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.19:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Food & Beverage Companies), 2015-2028
Figure 7.20:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Food & Beverage Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.21:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Food & Beverage Companies) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.22:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Product Revenue, by Other Industries), 2015-2028
Figure 7.23:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis  (Test Revenue, by Other Industries) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 7.24:    Global Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Consumer Analysis (Test Volume, by Other Industries) (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 8.1:    Industrial Microbiological QC Market, by Application
Figure 8.2:    Industrial Microbiological QC Market Share, by Application, 2018 and 2028
Figure 8.3:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Pharmaceutical Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.4:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Pharmaceutical Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.5:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Food and Beverage Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.6:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Food and Beverage Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.7:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Dairy Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.8:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Dairy Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.9:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Agriculture and Fermentation Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.10:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Agriculture and Fermentation Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.11:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Paper Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.12:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Paper Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.13:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Biotechnology Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.14:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Biotechnology Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.15:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Cosmetic and Personal Care Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.16:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Cosmetic and Personal Care Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.17:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Water and Environmental Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.18:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Water and Environmental Industry), 2015-2028
Figure 8.19:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Revenue, by Other Industries), 2015-2028
Figure 8.20:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market (Test Volume, by Other Industries), 2015-2028
Figure 9.1:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 9.2:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 9.3:    Global Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Region), 2015-2028
Figure 9.4:    North America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
Figure 9.5:    North America Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.6:    North America Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.7:    The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.8    The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.9:    The U.S. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.10:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.11:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.12:    Canada Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.13:    Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
Figure 9.14:    Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.15:    Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer),  2015-2028
Figure 9.16:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.17:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.18:    Germany Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.19:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.20:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.21:    France Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.22:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.23:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.24:    The U.K. Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.25:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.26:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.27:    Italy Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.28:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.29:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.30:    Spain Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.31:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.32:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.33:    Rest-of-Europe Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.34:    Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
Figure 9.35:    Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.36:    Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.37:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.38:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.39:    China Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.40:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.41:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.42:    Japan Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.43:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.44:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.45:    India Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.46:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.47:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.48:    Australia Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.49:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.50:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.51:    Rest-of-Asia-Pacific Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.52:    Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
Figure 9.53:    Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.54:    Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.55:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.56:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.57:    Brazil Industrial Microbiology QC Market, Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.58:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.59:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.60:    Mexico Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.61:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Product Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.62:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.63:    Rest-of-Latin America Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume, 2018 and 2028
Figure 9.64:    Rest-of-the-World Industrial Microbiology QC Market, 2015-2028
Figure 9.65:    Rest-of-the-World Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Revenue (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 9.66:    Rest-of-the-World Industrial Microbiology QC Market, by Test Volume (Consumer), 2015-2028
Figure 10.1:    3M Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.2:    3M Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.3:    3M Company: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.4:    3M Company: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.5:    3M Company: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.6:    3M Company: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.7:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Segment (2018)
Figure 10.8:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Net Revenue, by Geography (2018)
Figure 10.9:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2015-2018)
Figure 10.10:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: R&D Expenditure & Y-o-Y (2015-2018)
Figure 10.11:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.12:    Becton, Dickinson and Company: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.13:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.14:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.15:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.16:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.17:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.18:    Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.19:    Biolog, Inc.: Operating Segments
Figure 10.20:    Biolog, Inc.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.21:    bioMérieux SA : Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.22:    bioMérieux SA: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.23:    bioMérieux SA: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.24:    bioMérieux SA: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.25:    bioMérieux SA: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.26:    bioMérieux SA: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.27:    BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.28:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.29:    Bruker Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.30:    Bruker Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.31:    Bruker Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.32:    Bruker Corporation: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.33:    Bruker Corporation: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.34:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.35:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.36:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.37:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.38:    Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.39:    Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.40:    Danaher Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.41:    Danaher Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.42:    Danaher Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.43:    Danaher Corporation: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.44:    Danaher Corporation: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.45:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.46:    Merck KGaA: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.47:    Merck KGaA: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.48:    Merck KGaA: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.49:    Merck KGaA: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.50:    Merck KGaA: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.51:    Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.52:    Novacyt S.A.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.53:    Novacyt S.A.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.54:    Novacyt S.A.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.55:    Novacyt S.A.: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.56:    Novacyt S.A.: Company Timeline
Figure 10.57:    Novacyt S.A.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.58:    QIAGEN N.V.: Net Revenue, by Product Categories (2017)
Figure 10.59:    QIAGEN N.V.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.60:    QIAGEN N.V.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.61:    QIAGEN N.V.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.62:    QIAGEN N.V.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.63:    R-Biopharm AG: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.64:    Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.65:    Sartorius AG: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.66:    Sartorius AG: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.67:    Sartorius AG: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.68:    Sartorius AG: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.69:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.70:    Shimadzu Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.71:    Shimadzu Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.72:    Shimadzu Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.73:    Shimadzu Corporation: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.74:    Shimadzu Corporation: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.75:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Segment (2018)
Figure 10.76:    Sysmex Corporation: Net Revenue, by Geography (2018)
Figure 10.77:    Sysmex Corporation: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2015-2018)
Figure 10.78:    Sysmex Corporation: R&D Expenditure (2016-2018)
Figure 10.79:    Sysmex Corporation: Operating Segments (2018)
Figure 10.80:    Sysmex Corporation: SWOT Analysis
Figure 10.81:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Segment (2017)
Figure 10.82:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Net Revenue, by Geography (2017)
Figure 10.83:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Company Revenue & Y-o-Y (2014-2017)
Figure 10.84:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: R&D Expenditure (2015-2017)
Figure 10.85:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: Operating Segments (2017)
Figure 10.86:    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.: SWOT Analysis
Figure 11.1:    Considered Factors for Data Prediction and Modeling

Product safety is a global concern and is becoming evident among the general public. The governmental regulators and product manufacturers are keenly focused on maintaining the optimum quality of the products. The manufacturers are subjected to a stringent level of regulations to guarantee the microbiological quality control and composition of the product.  The microbial quality control tests are carried out throughout the production process, from the initial stage of raw material till the dispatch of the product. The environment of the production process is also monitored at regular intervals using the microbiological tests. Several technological advancements have been made in the field of industrial microbiology, those of which include the introduction of Rapid Microbiological Methods (RMMs). RMM technologies allow quicker detection, but often require a short enrichment stage before the microbiological screening.

A wide range of techniques have been applied to develop these rapid microbiological test methods are aimed at quantifying the product quality parameters. RMMs can help in saving a significant amount of time in the quality control procedure of the industrial process, though a common barrier in the adoption of this technology is the high cost associated with the technology. RMMs are expanding their application area and are now being looked upon by the microbiologists as a viable alternative to the traditional methods.

The global industrial microbiological QC market has been witnessing a steady growth. The market is expected to continue to grow with a single digit CAGR of 6.22% during the forecast period, 2019-2028. Growing at a CAGR of 4.70% during the forecast period of 2019-2028, the conventional culture-based methods segment is anticipated to generate a value of $793.1 million in 2028. However, the market for rapid microbiological methods currently dominates the global industrial microbiological QC market, and is anticipated to grow at the fastest CAGR of 7.33% during the forecast period 2019-2028.

The purpose of the study is to gain a holistic view of the global industrial microbiological QC market in terms of various factors, such as recent trends and product advancements, influencing the market. The scope of this report is centered upon conducting a detailed study of the products allied with the global industrial microbiological QC market, which includes various products, broadly classified as rapid microbiological methods and conventional culture-based methods. However, the market estimation only comprises manufacturers of these products. The global industrial microbiological QC market is segmented into four different segments namely technology, consumers, applications, and regions. These segments are further segmented into several sub-segments to ease the market estimation and to gain a holistic view of the market. The market has also been broadly segmented into product revenue, testing revenue, and testing volume with respect to the consumers and applications that are present in the market. The global market value was estimated using different approaches and validated with each other.

Based on region, the global industrial microbiological QC market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Rest-of-the-World (RoW). The regions have further been analyzed for product revenues, testing revenues, and testing volumes of the various products and processes present in the market.

The key manufacturers who have been contributing significantly to the global industrial microbiological QC market include 3M Company, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Biolog, Inc., bioMérieux SA, BIOTECON Diagnostics GmbH, Bruker Corporation, Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., Danaher Corporation, Merck KGaA, Novacyt S.A. (Primerdesign Ltd.), QIAGEN N.V., R-Biopharm AG, Sartorius AG, Shimadzu Corporation, Sysmex Corporation, and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., among others.

We understand that your business need specific answers pertaining to the market. And , therefore, we do provide customised research tailored to your need.

With the purchase of this report, you are entitled to certain degree of free customisation within the scope of the study.

Do get in touch to help us understand how we can serve u better with a custom solution to your research needs. We assure quick turnaround for your pressing business requirements.

Contact Information


Name *
Email *
 
Company Name *
Designation
 
 
Contact No. *
Other Details
 
 

Write the characters in the image above
 
 
* Required Fields


related reports






Get yourself updated on key emerging technology markets

Know about our market intelligence coverage in key sectors